
Automation is top of mind for food processors, who are looking for ways to cut labor costs, operate more efficiently and stay in compliance with food safety regulations.
Photo courtesy of Getty Images
Food Engineering's 2018 State of Food Manufacturing Survey
Our 40th annual survey shows food and beverage processors have automation top of mind
We’ve released the results of our 2019 State of Food Manufacturing Survey. Click here to read the report!
The food manufacturing industry faces any number of challenges, both great and small, but according to Food Engineering readers, the future is bright.
Almost two-thirds of respondents to our annual State of Food Manufacturing Survey expect throughput at their plants to grow this year compared to last year, and a little more than a third expect it to stay the same. That leaves just 3 percent of respondents who say they expect throughput to go down. Among those who expect throughput to increase, more than half expect it to increase by more than 10 percent.
Article Index:
The numbers are similar for what respondents expect for their companies as a whole. About 61 percent of respondents expect overall growth, while 37 percent expect throughput to remain the same. Of those who say they expect growth for their companies, 54 percent expect growth to be more than 10 percent.
The most common reason for the expectation of growth is increased sales, with both those who say they expect higher throughput at their location (41 percent) and those who expect higher throughput for their company (38 percent) listing it as the top reason. But in addition to that, demand, new products, efficiency and location expansion all were listed as reasons for growth.
This report will take a look at what our respondents say about the top manufacturing trends in the country, as well as changes in plant and company operations, budgeting, productivity, food safety and regulations.
Food Manufacturing Trends
Stop us if you’re heard this one before: Automation is expected to be the area where manufacturing operations will be most affected over the next five years. More than half (55 percent) of respondents cited automation, with efficiency/maintenance/ new equipment coming in a distant second, at 15 percent. Here’s a look at the top 10 trends from this year’s survey results.
The Top 10 Trends in the Food Manufacturing Industry
1. Automation: The industry continues to see huge interest in and adaptation of automation, as automated processes and procedures offer processors greater efficiency and throughput capabilities. Changing consumer demands, rising labor costs and regulations are all areas where processors are successfully adapting automated solutions, and while the idea of a completely automated plant is still a ways off, the production line of today has far more automated components than it did even a few years ago.
2. Efficiency/maintenance/new equipment: Efficiency is becoming ever more important as processors try to do more with less, keep up with consumer demands and comply with regulations without slowing down their production. Maintenance concerns are shaping how processors manage equipment and components, with tools such as automated reporting, sensors and fault detection offering new ways of keeping equipment running at peak efficiency. And, of course, new equipment costs and features are always top of mind for processors that need to replace existing equipment or build new production lines.
3. Clean label/healthy foods: As consumers become ever more conscious of what’s in the food they eat, they are pushing for more options such as organic, gluten- and GMO-free food, foods without ingredients such as high fructose corn syrup and products they know are allergen free. Clean label initiatives across the industry are aiming to serve ingredient-savvy customers with products that meet their goals without sacrificing taste, shelf life and quality.
4. Modern technology/new generation/ internet shopping: E-commerce is driving change across the industry, with processors having to adapt to customers who do most of their shopping online. This is most commonly seen in the packaging area, as processors embrace packaging products and technology—such as plastic bottles instead of glass—that can be sold on store shelves or shipped across the country.
5. Food safety/FSMA: As FSMA comes fully online, it continues to send ripples throughout the industry. While many processors are already in compliance with or even ahead of FSMA regulations, the overhaul to the industry’s safety rules and regulations has pushed processors to leap forward in how they ensure that food is safe and secure from ingredients all the way to the finished product.
6. Decline in workers/worker availability: Talk to a hiring manager in the food manufacturing industry about the challenges they face and you’ll probably hear them say that finding good, reliable workers with the needed skillsets or the willingness to learn them is a constant challenge. With a healthy economy limiting the number of workers available and cost pressures putting constraints on wages and benefits, the industry is searching for a solution to find the workforce it needs to continue to meet expectations. Immigration restrictions and crackdowns are also playing a role in these concerns.
7. Sustainability/eco-friendly: Sustainability is an admirable goal for any industry, but it presents unique challenges for food manufacturers. While cutting down on the use of resources such as electricity and water helps both the environment and the bottom line, there’s a baseline amount of resources that processors have to use. Saving water is great, but not if it means failing to comply with safety regulations. Consumers are also asking for more sustainable, locally grown or small environmental footprint ingredients, which is leading processors to re-evaluate everything from the supply chain to plant operations.
8. Consumer demand: Although this is a relatively small percentage of responses by itself, it touches just about every other category on the list. Consumer demands are constantly changing and evolving, and the pace of change driven by social media and other information-sharing tools among consumers can be hard for processors to keep up with. Specialty and artisanal processors are filling some of the gaps, but for larger companies, keeping up with consumer demands is requiring them to run a sprint when they’re used to a marathon.
9. Cost-related: Much like consumer demands, this is a category that touches all the others. Cost pressures from consumers looking to save money on their grocery bill puts pressure on at one end, while rising labor and ingredient costs squeeze from the other end.
10. Packaging: Processors devote a lot of time, money and resources to packaging, and it’s another area where consumer demands are driving changes. In addition to e-commerce friendly packaging, consumers are looking for more and better information on the package, less waste and single-serve or convenient packages for on-the-go meals. All of these demands are leading processors to explore new packaging options in an effort to balance meeting demands with the cost of developing new packaging solutions.
Budgets Looking Good, But Not Great
For the most part, budgets for packaging, processing and production equipment are looking good, according to our respondents. More than a third (36 percent) say the budget for equipment is going up, while a little more than half (53 percent) say it’s staying the same. About 11 percent say their equipment budget is decreasing.
When it comes to budgets for equipment, about a quarter (27 percent) of respondents say that they have less than $100,000 to spend on equipment, but this number is significantly higher among respondents from small companies, which is to be expected. More than half (55 percent) of companies say they will spend less than $500,000 on equipment. But 10 percent of respondents say their budgets for equipment are more than $5 million.
When we look at budgets for automation and control hardware and software, 28 percent of respondents say their budgets are going up. But of those respondents, 32 percent say they’re looking at increases of more than 25 percent in the amounts they have to spend on automation and control hardware and software, showing a clear trend, especially among mid-size companies, in spending more—in a lot of cases substantially more—on automation and controls.
As a share of overall budgets, the budget for equipment, software and services is relatively small in a lot of cases. About 65 percent of respondents say that equipment, soft ware and services make up 25 percent or less of the overall budget, with 23 percent of respondents saying it’s 26-50 percent and 12 percent saying it’s more than 50 percent.
Top 5 Process Control Purchases
Respondents expect a number of purchases related to process controls hardware and software. Here’s a look at the top five categories, with respondents allowed to pick more than one answer.
1. Lab analysis equipment/software: Almost 30 percent of respondents say they expect their location to purchase lab analysis equipment/software, with midsize (501-5,000 employees) and large (more than 5,000 employees) companies saying so at a higher rate than smaller companies. The likely drivers of this decision are FSMA compliance, other food safety strategies and quality control efforts.
2. Digital sensors/transmitters: As companies look to automate processes and procedures, digital sensors and transmitters help in multiple ways. Not only can they provide information from previously unmeasurable areas of the production line, but they can be used to provide information from legacy equipment that can’t speak directly to modern automation or control software.
3. Programmable logic/automation controllers (PLCs/PACs): Again we see the effects of automation, as processors look for ways to automate processes, procedures and even equipment that was previously restricted to manual control.
4. Plant control systems or upgrades: Almost the same percentage of respondents chose plant control systems or upgrades as PLCs/PACs or digital sensors/transmitters. All three of those categories are integral parts of an automation strategy, so it’s not surprising that all three would be common choices.
5. HACCP/Food safety management system: As HACCP becomes a more common part of food safety efforts (an effect of FSMA), processors are looking for ways to automate compliance and have better data reporting for compliance tracking, food safety management and recall management. Automated systems can help in all of those regards, as the data reporting and automation capabilities help streamline both food safety efforts and response time if something goes wrong.
Software Deployment, Backups and Network Security
As more of the food manufacturing process becomes automated and/or software driven, processors face new challenges when it comes to deploying new software, ensuring all software is up to date, backing up data and protecting their networks. As you will see in the cybersecurity feature in this issue, protection of intellectual property and control capabilities are a real concern, and processors must take steps to ensure they’re safe and secure.
Article Index:
A new category in the survey this year was “Current Methods Used for Software Applications Deployment,” as we asked processors how they are rolling out new or upgraded software applications. As the use of cloud-based systems has become more common, the food manufacturing industry is adopting it as well, but it hasn’t taken over yet.
Almost half of respondents (46 percent) say they are still using on-premises servers only, while a mixture of cloud-based and on-premises servers was also chosen by 46 percent of respondents. Only 8 percent say they are using only cloud-based methods to deploy software. For those companies saying they use both, it may be the case that companies with multiple facilities are using on-premises servers at the main location, while using cloud-based systems for remote deployment.
Only about a third of respondents say they use full back-up through an edge server while deploying software applications, but the majority (56 percent) of respondents say they’re not sure. Only 13 percent say they do not use a full back-up. Among those who do full back-ups, both integrated and non-integrated applications were popular choices.
As for network security, respondents were allowed to choose multiple responses to best show how they protect their networks. Here’s a look at the top five responses.
Top 5 Steps Taken to Secure Network Software Systems
1. Gateways and firewalls: More than half (56 percent) say they use gateways and firewalls, which is not surprising based on best practices for IT security. Gateways and firewalls are fundamental pieces of network security, and food processors are adopting them as part of their cybersecurity strategies.
2. Using an inside IT group for plant-wide security: A full 40 percent of respondents say they use their inside IT group for plant-wide security, which is also unsurprising. Most mid-size and large companies, and even some small ones, have dedicated IT people, and they lead the way in ensuring that all networks and all equipment that can connect to the networks are safe and secure.
3. Multi-level log-on access for employees: A single-level log-on for employees—where employees simply enter their passwords and are allowed in—is convenient, but not very secure. Everyone’s heard the stories about employees who write down their passwords at their workstation or something similar, and the reason everyone’s heard them is because they happen all too often. A multi-level log-on process, such as requiring an employee to also enter a code sent to a mobile device, requires more than just a simple password, and offers an extra layer of security to prevent someone from stealing a password and wreaking havoc.
4. Updating client computers: Keeping computers up to date with software updates and security patches helps guard against outside actors being able to take advantage of security exploits in operating systems or software. Cloud-based systems help expedite the rollout of security and software updates, as well as giving IT personnel the ability to keep track of what computers have and haven’t been updated.
5. Cybersecurity training: More common among midsize and large companies, cybersecurity training helps employees understand the role they play in keeping networks secure. Operators may not realize the role they play in network security unless they’re trained on potential vulnerabilities and how they can guard against them.
Improving Productivity
As processors look to improve productivity, respondents identified a number of areas where their locations or companies can improve. While a number of respondents identified common areas such as equipment upgrades, improved maintenance systems and improved skills training, the three areas that received the most responses as a “great need” are as follows.
- Improved marketing/production communication (24 percent)
- Improved communication between manufacturing levels/areas (23 percent)
- Increased flexibility on existing lines (17 percent)
As the survey shows, one of the most effective steps processors can take to improve productivity is to improve communications between different areas or departments. Communication between production and marketing departments was not only listed as a “great need” by 24 percent of respondents, but was listed as at least some need by 71 percent of respondents. Improved communication between manufacturing levels/areas was listed as a need by 68 percent of respondents.
While skills training, equipment upgrades and supply chain management are all important aspects of improving productivity, responses in the communication areas show that processors may be best served by trying to improve communication in addition to addressing the traditional concerns.
Food Safety Methods in Use
As FSMA comes fully online, processors need to have food safety processes and procedures in place. Respondents were allowed to pick multiple responses, and here are the top five food safety methods they chose.
1. Food safety management system (67 percent): Fully two-thirds of respondents say they have a food safety management system in place, which is an increase from 56 percent of respondents in the 2017 survey. Food safety management systems, whether automated, manual or a hybrid of the two, offer processors a way to ensure that they are in compliance with FSMA and other food safety regulations by providing a documented plan for managing food safety.
2. Recall plan (66 percent): This number is unchanged from the 2017 survey, which isn’t surprising. Recalls are expensive, time-consuming and potentially damaging to the company’s livelihood, so having a plan in place is critical to ensure that recalls are conducted properly and efficiently.
3. Food allergen controls (65 percent): One of the major drivers of recalls is undeclared or unintended allergens in products, so processors that have a robust allergen control plan can help avoid those recalls. Taking steps such as route planning for materials through the plant, using color-coded utensils, production scheduling (e.g., running egg products on the line last) and washdown schedules can help ensure allergens stay out of allergen-free products.
4. Comprehensive staff training (63 percent): Food safety plans are only as good as their execution, and comprehensive training helps ensure they are followed by production personnel. Human error is a common reason for recalls or having to trash product due to food safety or cross-contamination concerns, and training helps cut down on those incidents.
5. Lot level traceability (58 percent): Automation and tracking software help processors keep track of ingredients from the time they come in the door until they leave as finished products, and in some cases even before they enter the plant. Being able to trace products and ingredients as far as possible can help prevent food safety problems from slipping through.
> See more State of Food Manufacturing reports
The information in this article comes from: Clear Seas Research, 2018 Food Engineering State of Food Manufacturing, October 2018. Clear Seas Research is a full service, B-to-B market research company focused on making the complex clear. Custom research solutions include brand positioning, new product development, customer experiences and marketing effectiveness solutions. Clear Seas offers a broad portfolio of primary, syndicated research reports and powers the leading B-to-B panel for corporate researchers, myCLEARopinion Panel, in the architecture, engineering, construction, food, beverage, manufacturing, packaging and security industries. Learn more at https://clearseasresearch.com/foodengineering.